First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholar Non-leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ).ĥ01–513. A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of aĢ20–242. Stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags inġ–22. Cooper ( Eds.), The handbook of work & health psychology (pp. A fit approach to work stress and health. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĬhange-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model.ġ7–26. Passmore ( Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of leadership, change, and organizational development (pp. When leaders are bullies: Concepts, antecedents, and Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptualĢ07–216. Transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment.ħ35–744. Yammarino ( Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead, Monographs in Leadership and Management, Vol. Of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates Meta-analytic test of their relative validity.Ħ4, 7–52. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health,ģ1, 3–14. Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on Normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: Examining First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholarģ07–311. Neale ( Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. First citation in article Google Scholarĥ, 323–370. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Survey response rate levels and trends in organizationalġ139–1160. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set. Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour.Ĥ38–452. Hence, destructive forms of leadership seem to be better predictors of job satisfaction than are constructive forms of leadership which is in line with the notion that “bad is stronger than good.”ĭestructive leadership: Conceptualisation, measurement, prevalence and Dissatisfied subordinates did not, however, report increased exposure to destructive forms of leadership, disconfirming the gloomy perception mechanism of dissatisfied and stressed subordinates to perceive their leaders in an ever more negative way. A reversed relationship was found between job satisfaction and subsequent perceived constructive leadership over the 6-month lag. Tyrannical leadership predicted a decrease in subordinate job satisfaction over a 6-month period, while laissez-faire leadership turned out as the sole predictor of job satisfaction over a 2-year time lag. Interestingly, destructive forms of leadership were the sole significant predictors in both studies. Based on two prospective and representative surveys, with time lags of 6 months (Study 1) and 2 years (Study 2), respectively, we investigated the relative influence of constructive, laissez-faire, and tyrannical leadership behaviors, respectively, on followers job satisfaction. Knowledge on short and long-term effects of perceived leadership behaviors on subordinates’ job satisfaction, and particularly so regarding the relative influences of constructive and destructive forms of leadership, is scarce.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |